Rss Feed
Tweeter button
Facebook button
Delicious button
Digg button
Stumbleupon button

How Come Countries Believe They Need To Have Armed Forces?

June 27, 2011 | Author: | Posted in Business

The term “military” or “defence” can be used in an individual sense in respect of a single soldier and what strategies the individual soldier takes to defend himself similar to; carrying protecting equipment, using armaments or establishing protection resembling a digging a trench or a foxhole.

Defence is basically a time period used when describing a navy unit’s defensive ways when working against an opposing forces offensive, perhaps by in search of to circumnavigate the enemy place, delay an enemy assault or to wage a war of attrition whereby the enemy will lose numbers eventually permitting the defensive power to form a defensive position or perform an offensive maneuver.

In navy operations planning, a defensive technique is the policy of preventing an attack, or minimizing the injury of an assault, by the forces assuming defense in strategic depth for preventing an enemy from conquering territory. Within the scope of a nationwide defense policy, defense is used to include most army issues.

The Vietcong employed each regular army models and guerrilla items with the intention to battle an offensive and defensive strategy.

By the use of smaller cellular guerrilla forces the Vietcong waged a struggle on the resources of the American troopers, which included destroying supplies and provide routes. Additionally they used the Individuals sources when producing booby traps, including discarded gadgets such as tin cans in addition to unexploded bombs which they’d collect and use for mines.

Ultimately the efforts of the smaller cellular defensive guerrillas caused such an impact that the principle army was capable of overrun the American forces with a large assault know because the Tet Offensive.

Nowhere is this example extra outlined than within the Chilly Conflict stand offs of the mid to late twentieth century. One specific example of this is the Cuban Missile Crisis which concerned the US and the Soviet Union in 1962. The Soviet and Cuban authorities had positioned nuclear weapons on Cuba as seen by American reconnaissance planes and, with the tension between the 2 international locations already palpable, a standoff ensued with the ‘very real’ risk of a nuclear conflict occurring. Happily diplomatic proceedings ensured that the crisis was settled relatively amicably with the dismantling of the weaponry and a no-invasion settlement in place from the American authorities.

The role of military defence has been gradually shifted away from its primary role of providing security to enhancing commercial interest. With industrial growth and advancement of science and technology, the defence production led to a market oriented producer- purchaser relation between the developed and developing countries.The poor nation afflicted with conflicts became a super market for defence deals. For the powerful, military prowess which was earlier synonymous with political power has become a trademark of economic power.

The world community is already wiser and is conscious of the bigger threat of survival presented by depleting resources. They campaign for pooled resources through collective efforts to save mankind and the world from further depletion.

History evidenced the worthless used of armed coercion. If a stick is given to a hungry man to stop him from his cry for hunger, he will roar to bite you and connive with the neighbor to cause disaster. Instead of using the resources to crush the anger, it would be wiser to use the resource to fill the hungry belly and teach the hungry man to grow crops to sustain his future needs. The resources used for military purchase can fruitfully be used for peace and development.

The political compulsions may tempt the authority to take pride in the strength of the defence force. The military men pride themselves as the savior of the country. With due respect and regard to the defence services, I have a considered opinion to express. I think military might is an outdated notion of exalting the national self esteem. Recent history of military powers have shown the fatality of this approach. The pride of the nation is in the human asset and any nation that failed to nurture its most precious asset will lose its national pride even if it owns the most sophisticated war weapons to erase the entire human race.

Big defence budgets in the developed world may entail an economic investment return out of defence production and sale exports. But how long can this go on? For poor countries, big defence budget produces a negative return, and hits the belly of the poor as his pie is taken away with every military purchase.In the new age, the defence security trade mark will diminish as more focus is now on economic security and sustainability of the future. The creative and innovative thinking to meet the future challenges will be a supreme consideration while war weapons will be valueless in the approaching apocalypse.

For instance, they might become Natural Disaster response companies, or design a Planetary Defense system to stop an incoming asteroid. It’s still defense in many regards. Maybe they would go out and stop Cyclones, Hurricanes, and typhoons.

Still, it’s almost a pipe dream to talk about anyway, especially in the present period because let’s face it wars are not going away anytime soon. So we could easily be 100 or 200 years from now before humans stop having wars. And right now we have a bigger problem anyway and that is international terrorism and the prospects of a rogue nation state giving nuclear weapons to terrorists. We definitely need a defense system to track, and stop such terrorist events, especially on soft targets.

Further, I don’t see nations with nukes as so bad, more I am worried about lunatic dictators, or terrorists having them. I’d rather the world didn’t have nuclear weapons at all, but since so many nations do, and more will soon follow, I very much doubt any nation will get rid of them, because they will want to be able to protect themselves, against the last nation that refuses to get rid of them. Now then, my acquaintance states the obvious;

In my personal library I have almost a whole row of books on the topic of nuclear proliferation, the Cold War, and many reports put forth during the Cold War by the Rand Corporation. I believe it is scary stuff, and it’s quite unfortunate, but it is what it is and we must deal with it without blinders. Please consider all this and think on it. If you have any comments, questions, or concerns you may e-mail me. I will not accept e-mails from anti-nuclear power activists.

For several years, Katieclark has been focused on exploring the world of Military News. He enjoys the discipline and tries to share as much as he can with othis involved parties Katieclark spends his hours perusing all relevant and available defence and military oriented information to bring you the best content.

For anyone thinking about learning more about how, please check out related Military Articles. Welcome to a whole world of content!

Article Source

Comments Off Tags: , , , ,


This author has published 6 articles so far. More info about the author is coming soon.

Comments are closed.