Command and management is about resolution making, the train of direction by a properly designated commander over assigned and attached forces in the accomplishment of a mission, and is supported by info expertise (the computer systems and communications part of C4I). The United States is aggressively exploiting these technologies in order to achieve information superiority, with the target of reaching higher and quicker choices, and regularly projecting, albeit with uncertainties, future desired states and directing actions to result in those future states.
Command and control refers back to the exercise of authority and route by a correctly designated commander over assigned and attached forces in the accomplishment of the mission. Command and management features are performed by an arrangement of personnel, gear, communications, facilities, and procedures employed by a commander in planning, directing, coordinating, and controlling forces and operations in the accomplishment of the mission.
Command refers back to the authority that a commander in the Armed Forces lawfully workouts over subordinates by advantage of rank or assignment. Command includes the authority and accountability for effectively utilizing accessible
assets and for planning the employment of, organizing, directing, coordinating, and controlling military forces for the accomplishment of assigned missions.
Computing and communications are two pervasive enabling applied sciences that support C2 and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance. Computers and communications course of and transport information.
Control is authority which can be lower than full command exercised by a commander over a part of the actions of subordinate or different organizations. Physical or psychological pressures exerted with the intent to guarantee that an agent or group will reply as directed.
Intelligence is the product ensuing from the collection, processing, integration, evaluation, evaluation, and interpretation of accessible information regarding international international locations or areas. Info and knowledge about an adversary obtained via remark, investigation, analysis, or understanding.
One necessary capability that C4I systems provide commanders is situational consciousness–details about the placement and status of enemy and friendly forces. An essential component of reaching superiority in decision making, it doesn’t alone assure superior decision making. Commanders must take related knowledge and combine it with their judgment–together with tough-to-quantify aspects of human conduct (similar to fatigue, expertise degree, and stress), the uncertainty of information, and the believable future states resulting from actions by both their own force and the enemy–to make decisions about future actions and find out how to convey those selections in ways to facilitate their correct execution. In doing so, commanders are supported by instruments to enable and accelerate the planning and resolution-making course of, to attain the choice-making superiority envisioned by DOD.
And, of course, to be efficient, command choices should be applied, a process to which C4I technologies are additionally related (e.g., in rushing up the hyperlink by which targeting data is handed to weapons, the so-known as sensor-to-shooter hyperlink). The event and use of the suitable tools permit the commander to focus better on those issues associated with the essence of command–the artwork versus the science. As extra and higher-automated instruments are developed and people are educated to use them, it would develop into much more vital to acknowledge the artwork of command as distinguished from the mechanics of the instruments used to supply information.
Leadership was once about hard skills such as planning, finance and business analysis. When command and control ruled the corporate world, the leaders were heroic rationalists who moved people around like pawns and fought like stags. When they spoke, the company employees jumped.
The entire career system in some organisations is based on using hard functional skills to progress, but when executives reach the top of the organisation, many different skills are required. Corporate leaders may find that although they can do the financial analysis and the strategic planning, they are poor at communicating ideas to employees or colleagues, or have little insight into how to motivate people. The modern chief executive requires an array of skills.
Some suggest that we expect too much of leaders. Indeed, “renaissance” men and women are rare. Leadership in a modern organisation is highly complex and it is increasingly difficult – sometimes impossible – to find all the necessary traits in a single person. Among the most crucial skills is the ability to capture your audience – you will be competing with lots of other people for their attention. Leaders of the future will also have to be emotionally efficient. They will promote variation rather than promoting people in their own likeness. They will encourage experimentation and enable people to learn from failure. They will build and develop people.
Is it too much to expect of one person? I think it probably is: In the future, we will see leadership groups rather than individual leaders. This change in emphasis from individuals towards groups was charted by the leadership guru Warren Bennis in his work “Organizing Genius” He concentrates on famous ground-breaking groups rather than individual leaders and focuses, for example, on the achievements of Xerox’s Palo Alto Research Centre, the group behind the 1992 Clinton campaign, and the Manhattan Project which delivered the atomic bomb. “None of us is as smart as all of us”, says Professor Bennis.
While flexibility is important in this new leadership model, it should not be interpreted as weakness.
The two most lauded corporate chiefs of the past decade, Percy Barnevik, of Asea Brown Boveri, and Jack Welch, of General Electric, dismantled bureaucratic structures using both soft and hard skills. They coach and cajole as well as command and control. The “leader as coach” is yet another phrase more often seen in business books than in the real world. Acting as a coach to a colleague is not something that comes easily to many executives. It is increasingly common for executives to need mentoring. They need to talk through decisions and to think through the impact of their behaviour on others in the organisation.
In the macho era, support was for failures, but now there is a growing realisation that leaders are human after all, and that leadership is as much a human art as a rational science. Today’s leaders don’t follow rigid role models but prefer to nurture their own leadership style. They do not do people’s jobs for them or put their faith in developing a personality cult. They regard leadership as drawing people and disparate parts of the organisation together in ways that makes individuals and the organisation more effective.
Mr. Bowman has been publishing defence news web content for multiple years. He considers herself an expert industry observer and commentator so he enjoys his work a great deal. He specializes in studying all defence and military related issues and he tirelessly creates articles focused on developments in the defence industry.
If you are interested in learning more about military and defence challenges, please check out related content in the form of Military Articles today. Explore a fantastic world of new content!
Author: jabowThis author has published 6 articles so far. More info about the author is coming soon.